-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DEPR: Series ndarray properties (strides, data, base, itemsize, flags) #20721
Merged
TomAugspurger
merged 10 commits into
pandas-dev:master
from
jorisvandenbossche:depr-series-ndarray-attrs
Apr 25, 2018
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c3ac291
DEPR: Series ndarray properties (strides, data, base, itemsize, flags)
jorisvandenbossche 11182b1
better warning message
jorisvandenbossche 1aeaf2e
add whatsnew
jorisvandenbossche 5339975
fix usage in tests
jorisvandenbossche c78d5d6
fix remaining tests
jorisvandenbossche 5bd2940
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into depr-series-ndarr…
jorisvandenbossche 160ace0
also deprecate DatetimeIndex.base
jorisvandenbossche d2088d2
array -> asarray
jorisvandenbossche 7687330
fix usage of base in DatetimeIndexConstructor (_deepcopy_if_needed)
jorisvandenbossche feb7caf
fix usage of .base in BlockManager test_copy
jorisvandenbossche File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ def test_series_agg_multi_pure_python(): | |
'F': np.random.randn(11)}) | ||
|
||
def bad(x): | ||
assert (len(x.base) > 0) | ||
assert (len(x.values.base) > 0) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Not really sure what the purpose of this assert actually is (was introduced in 71e9046) |
||
return 'foo' | ||
|
||
result = data.groupby(['A', 'B']).agg(bad) | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
your explanation doesn't make sense, we are deprecating these no? you need to change the way its accessed in the code to remove the warnings.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The explanation perfectly makes sense, but you don't like the way I solved it I suppose (I agree it is not the nicest, but I was thinking that this would only be temporarily until DatetimeTZBlock is an ExtensionBlock).
To fix the usage itself,
.base
is used in two placed:Block.is_view
: this I can override inDatetimeTzBlock
to checkself.values.values.base
concatenate_join_units
:pandas/pandas/core/internals.py
Line 5544 in ede11af
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
my point is this method should not exist (as you are ddeprecateding), and would rather have you fix the usage
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As I said, I agree with that. Do you have a suggestion for the second case? (inside
concatenate_join_units
) In #20745 I need to touch the same code, and checked if the values have abase
attribute, but that also feels hackyThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, see my comment there, only check base if its an ndarray