-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 700
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add GenesisConfig
presets for templates runtimes (minimal and solochain)
#5790
Comments
21 tasks
iulianbarbu
changed the title
Add
Add Sep 20, 2024
GenesisConfig
presets for template runtimes (minimal and solochain)GenesisConfig
presets for templates runtimes (minimal and solochain)
@iulianbarbu I have also similar issue for other missing runtimes: #5704, you can take it, if you want :) |
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 5, 2024
# Description Closes [#5790](#5790). Useful for starting nodes based on minimal/solochain when doing development or for testing omni node with less happy code paths. It is reusing the presets defined for the nodes chain specs. ## Integration Specifically useful for development/testing if generating chain-specs for `minimal` or `solochain` runtimes from `templates` directories. ## Review Notes Added `genesis_config_presets` modules for both minimal/solochain. I reused the presets defined in each node `chain_spec` module correspondingly. ### PRDOC Not sure who uses templates, maybe node devs and runtime devs at start of their learning journey, but happy to get some guidance on how to write the prdoc if needed. ### Thinking out loud I saw concerns around sharing functionality for such genesis config presets between the template chains. I think there might be a case for doing that, on the lines of this comment: #4739 (comment). I would add that `parachains-common::genesis_config_heleper` contains a few methods from those mentioned, but I am unsure if using it as a dependency for templates is correct. Feels like the comment suggests there should be a `commons` crate concerning just `templates`, which I agree with to some degree, if we assume `cumulus` needs might be driven in certain directions that are not relevant to `templates` and vice versa. However I am not so certain about this, so would welcome some thoughts, since I am seeing `parachains-common` being used already in a few runtime implementations: https://crates.io/crates/parachains-common/reverse_dependencies?page=3, so might be a good candidate already for the `common` logic. --------- Signed-off-by: Iulian Barbu <iulian.barbu@parity.io>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The runtime should start exposing at least a
development
genesis-config, which should be used for testing omni nodes started based on chain-specs generated for templates runtime.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: