-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 699
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
xcm-emulator: add Rococo<>Westend bridge and add tests for assets transfers over the bridge #2251
Merged
acatangiu
merged 11 commits into
paritytech:master
from
acatangiu:xcm-emulator-rococo-westend-bridge
Nov 14, 2023
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c228db2
xcm-emulator: switch from Rococo<>Wococo to Rococo<>Westend bridge an…
acatangiu c5265e7
xcm-emulator: remove wococo chains
acatangiu 942092f
xcm-emulator: move bridge tests under per-bridge crate
acatangiu 3daf65c
Revert "xcm-emulator: move bridge tests under per-bridge crate"
acatangiu 8308f7e
xcm-emulator: add ROCs & WNDs transfers tests across R-W bridge
acatangiu 255acf5
Merge branch 'master' of github.com:paritytech/polkadot-sdk into xcm-…
acatangiu 4c730f9
Merge branch 'master' of github.com:paritytech/polkadot-sdk into xcm-…
acatangiu 2824320
fix merge damage
acatangiu 4a595c7
xcm-emulator: add foreign assets helpers to emulated/common
acatangiu 9ca8e17
xcm-emulator: add bi-directional transfers of both ROCs & WNDs across…
acatangiu 7e8a870
xcm-emulator: add reserve accounts checks to bridge asset transfer tests
acatangiu File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@acatangiu I dont know if this is possible to deduplicate easily:
to the one generic
they are doing exactly the same thing AH1 -> BH1 -> BH2 -> AH2 and AH2 -> BH2 -> BH1 -> AH1,
we could possibly reuse for BHKusama/BHPolkadot,
maybe with some macro helper? But sure, also no that big issue to have copies.
but very cool that we have bi-directional tests now 👍 👍 👍