fix regression in approval-voting introduced in #3747 #3831
+171
−4
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ordian
added
R0-silent
alexggh
approved these changes
Mar 26, 2024
ordian
changed the title
AndreiEres
approved these changes
Mar 26, 2024
alindima
approved these changes
Mar 26, 2024
sandreim
approved these changes
Mar 26, 2024
dharjeezy
pushed a commit
to dharjeezy/polkadot-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 9, 2024
…tytech#3831) Fixes paritytech#3826. The docs on the `candidates` field of `BlockEntry` were incorrectly stating that they are sorted by core index. The (incorrect) optimization was introduced in paritytech#3747 based on this assumption. The actual ordering is based on `CandidateIncluded` events ordering in the runtime. We revert this optimization here. - [x] verify the underlying issue - [x] add a regression test --------- Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
This was referenced Jun 5, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #3826.
The docs on the
candidatesfield ofBlockEntrywere incorrectly stating that they are sorted by core index. The (incorrect) optimization was introduced in #3747 based on this assumption. The actual ordering is based onCandidateIncludedevents ordering in the runtime. We revert this optimization here.