Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release crates io v1.8.0 staking backport #4087

Conversation

gpestana
Copy link
Contributor

This backport PR should bump the pallet-staking from 30.0.1 to 30.0.2.

Backports for 1.8:

Relevant Issues:

Currently, the staking logic does not prevent a controller from becoming
a stash of *another* ledger (introduced by [removing this
check](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1484/files#diff-3aa6ceab5aa4e0ab2ed73a7245e0f5b42e0832d8ca5b1ed85d7b2a52fb196524L850)).
Given that the remaining of the code expects that never happens, bonding
a ledger with a stash that is a controller of another ledger may lead to
data inconsistencies and data losses in bonded ledgers. For more
detailed explanation of this issue:
https://hackmd.io/@gpestana/HJoBm2tqo/%2FTPdi28H7Qc2mNUqLSMn15w

In a nutshell, when fetching a ledger with a given controller, we may be
end up getting the wrong ledger which can lead to unexpected ledger
states.

This PR also ensures that `set_controller` does not lead to data
inconsistencies in the staking ledger and bonded storage in the case
when a controller of a stash is a stash of *another* ledger. and
improves the staking `try-runtime` checks to catch potential issues with
the storage preemptively.

In summary, there are two important cases here:

1. **"Sane" double bonded ledger**

When a controller of a ledger is a stash of *another* ledger. In this
case, we have:

```
> Bonded(stash, controller)
(A, B)  // stash A with controller B
(B, C) // B is also a stash of another ledger
(C, D)

> Ledger(controller)
Ledger(B) = L_a (stash = A)
Ledger(C) = L_b (stash = B)
Ledger(D) = L_c (stash = C)
```

In this case, the ledgers can be mutated and all operations are OK.
However, we should not allow `set_controller` to be called if it means
it results in a "corrupt" double bonded ledger (see below).

3. **"Corrupt" double bonded ledger**

```
> Bonded(stash, controller)
(A, B)  // stash A with controller B
(B, B)
(C, D)
```
In this case, B is a stash and controller AND is corrupted, since B is
responsible for 2 ledgers which is not correct and will lead to
inconsistent states. Thus, in this case, in this PR we are preventing
these ledgers from mutating (i.e. operations like bonding extra etc)
until the ledger is brought back to a consistent state.

--- 

**Changes**:
- Checks if stash is already a controller when calling `Call::bond`
(fixes the regression introduced by [removing this
check](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1484/files#diff-3aa6ceab5aa4e0ab2ed73a7245e0f5b42e0832d8ca5b1ed85d7b2a52fb196524L850));
- Ensures that all fetching ledgers from storage are done through the
`StakingLedger` API;
- Ensures that -- when fetching a ledger from storage using the
`StakingLedger` API --, a `Error::BadState` is returned if the ledger
bonding is in a bad state. This prevents bad ledgers from mutating (e.g.
`bond_extra`, `set_controller`, etc) its state and avoid further data
inconsistencies.
- Prevents stashes which are controllers or another ledger from calling
`set_controller`, since that may lead to a bad state.
- Adds further try-state runtime checks that check if there are ledgers
in a bad state based on their bonded metadata.

Related to #3245

---------

Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <5588131+kianenigma@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: kianenigma <kian@parity.io>
@gpestana gpestana added the A3-backport Pull request is already reviewed well in another branch. label Apr 11, 2024
@paritytech-cicd-pr
Copy link

The CI pipeline was cancelled due to failure one of the required jobs.
Job name: test-linux-stable-int
Logs: https://gitlab.parity.io/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/-/jobs/5887073

@gpestana
Copy link
Contributor Author

closing in lieu of #4142

@gpestana gpestana closed this Apr 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A3-backport Pull request is already reviewed well in another branch.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants