-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 699
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
pallet ranked collective: max member count per rank #4807
Conversation
/// Therefore, the limit `m` at rank `x` sets the maximum total member count for rank `x` | ||
/// and all ranks above. | ||
/// The `None` indicates no member count limit for the given rank. | ||
type MaxMemberCount: MaybeConvert<Rank, MemberIndex>; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we have a default config for this pallet? Would be nice to set this to ()
to avoid the breaking change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, it does not have. There is also a discussion to use default configs only for tests and maybe common configs for system parachains https://forum.polkadot.network/t/seeking-feedback-on-derive-impl-for-default-configurations-in-pallet-templates/7584
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
also here #4689
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think there should still be a trivial implementation of this to reduce copy&paste.
Some struct like UnlimitedMembersPerRank
or so that just always returns None
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
MaybeConvert
has a tuple implementation, which always returns none
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, so it is possible to just pass ()
? Then i misunderstood the discussion, good!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes
bot merge |
@muharem |
Configuration for the maximum member count per rank, with the option for no limit.
Configuration for the maximum member count per rank, with the option for no limit.