Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2023. It is now read-only.

approval-voting: remove redundant validation check #6266

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 12, 2022
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
20 changes: 3 additions & 17 deletions node/core/approval-voting/src/lib.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2404,28 +2404,14 @@ async fn launch_approval<Context>(

match val_rx.await {
Err(_) => return ApprovalState::failed(validator_index, candidate_hash),
Ok(Ok(ValidationResult::Valid(commitments, _))) => {
Ok(Ok(ValidationResult::Valid(_, _))) => {
// Validation checked out. Issue an approval command. If the underlying service is unreachable,
// then there isn't anything we can do.

gum::trace!(target: LOG_TARGET, ?candidate_hash, ?para_id, "Candidate Valid");

let expected_commitments_hash = candidate.commitments_hash;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah, this make sense, we also check for this in validate_candidate_exhaustive

if commitments.hash() == expected_commitments_hash {
let _ = metrics_guard.take();
return ApprovalState::approved(validator_index, candidate_hash)
} else {
// Commitments mismatch - issue a dispute.
issue_local_invalid_statement(
&mut sender,
session_index,
candidate_hash,
candidate.clone(),
);

metrics_guard.take().on_approval_invalid();
return ApprovalState::failed(validator_index, candidate_hash)
}
let _ = metrics_guard.take();
return ApprovalState::approved(validator_index, candidate_hash)
},
Ok(Ok(ValidationResult::Invalid(reason))) => {
gum::warn!(
Expand Down
5 changes: 0 additions & 5 deletions node/core/candidate-validation/src/lib.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -467,11 +467,6 @@ where
.await;

if let Ok(ValidationResult::Valid(ref outputs, _)) = validation_result {
// If validation produces new commitments we consider the candidate invalid.
sandreim marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
if candidate_receipt.commitments_hash != outputs.hash() {
return Ok(ValidationResult::Invalid(InvalidCandidate::CommitmentsHashMismatch))
}

let (tx, rx) = oneshot::channel();
match runtime_api_request(
sender,
Expand Down