-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 142
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
use git polkadot-sdk deps #208
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I probably need to mark it as publish = false if we decide to keep git ref
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it can't be released anyway with the git refs, but yes I think we had this before
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All git deps should be more spcific
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it can't be released anyway with the git refs, but yes I think we had this before
You mean we should use a tag? Isn't relying on the lock file more convenient to update to newer version of the code? |
Better to be explicit, we can't guarantee someone will install using |
Sounds good will do that. Thanks for the feedback Andrew |
@ascjones updated to use |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, though we must remember to switch back to crates.io dependencies as soon as they are available.
I should probably use this branch to check that ink e2e tests are still passing before merging right? Anything else you do usually ? |
Yes that's a good idea to do that, you can either do that here or as part releasing the next version with these changes. |
found some issues with transfer that has to be renamed to transfer_allow_death in ink e2e test. |
No description provided.