This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
Properly set the max proof size weight on defaults and tests #12383
Merged
Merged
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
16 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
94bc841
Properly set the max proof size weight on defaults and tests
KiChjang 04ef2ab
cargo fmt
KiChjang a6ee94f
Set proper max proof size for contracts pallet tests
KiChjang 2b137ba
Properly set max proof size for node
KiChjang 4c31953
Properly set max proof size for frame system mock
KiChjang 5b297e5
Update test expectations
KiChjang aaf27f6
Update test expectations
KiChjang 14c1665
Properly set max proof size for balances mock
KiChjang 1a00469
Update test expectations
KiChjang 447af23
Update test expectations
KiChjang bb6c949
Properly set max proof size for democracy mock
KiChjang 3cc7bfe
Properly set max proof size for scheduler mock
KiChjang b9db439
Properly set max proof size for fast unstake mock
KiChjang 8df6d7c
Properly set max proof size for tx payment mock
KiChjang f14a2a5
Properly set max proof size for elections phragmen mock
KiChjang 166955a
Properly set max proof size for node template
KiChjang File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In a general note, this will not work for Parachains. Parachains have the max proof size defined by the relay chain and this value could change any block (it isn't but it is a value that is changeable on the relay chain). So, we would need to have a dynamic way of getting the max proof size.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bkchr getting the weight of the pov from the validation data is a solution here right? Because, this "could" change from the relay side dynamically, or can we just assume that
MAX_POV_SIZE
from the primitives is always good to use statically?