This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2023. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Migration testing runtime API/Bot #8038
Migration testing runtime API/Bot #8038
Changes from 19 commits
4c0abc5
7f9b5b8
4883812
be549b4
8e97733
d84dad4
aeb7a0e
d968f58
ce4128b
ee8ae08
62be119
712c240
9a23940
93f299a
3cea840
ab9d4a3
b13ea31
d3a2368
c8ba546
2f9ad0e
6db195c
b8ab620
be5210d
b5e394b
deb03d4
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
out of curiosity, why async here ? instead of sync like we do for benchmarks ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
remote-externalities is working with async/await, my assumption was that in such case you need to use the async_runner 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this looks like a structural change but I don't know that much about the client to say.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it is fine but yeah might be worth asking, maybe @cecton?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Normally you don't need to instantiate this but I guess in your case it makes sense if you want to benefit from the clean shutdown of the
TaskManager
🤔 ... so I'm not opposed to it. @expenses maybe has another opinion on this?On the other hand I'm worried by the tokio runtime created later on. You are creating and running 2 tokio runtimes.