This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2023. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Embed runtime version as a custom section #8688
Embed runtime version as a custom section #8688
Changes from 6 commits
217a874
259d06a
03eea2b
d4a3038
ceced97
422363a
76f6c37
53ffc97
866b13f
0f13caa
93f2036
78fb99e
84c63c0
d0ec418
1621d6c
689116a
bc41d06
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not entirely sure how would that work. Currently, this code takes an iterator of custom sections, leaves only sections that we are interested in, takes the first one which gives us an option and then we narrow the contents of this section to only its payload. But in the proposed version the result seems to be not an option
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe I can introduce you to: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.bool.html#method.then ;)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
TIL. This however misses the point, if I understand you correctly. The problem is the expression in the proposed code is typed as
Iterator
whereas the function returns anOption
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
filter
+next
is afind
though.We can simplify the code to
Iterator::find
+Option::map
. That will reduce the number of combinators by one.We could use a
Iterator::find_map
, but that would use nestedbool::then
. But I consider nested combis harder to reason about and I would guessbool::then
also is not among commonly used functions out there.