Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update scale-info and parity-scale-codec requirements #462

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Mar 1, 2022
Merged

Update scale-info and parity-scale-codec requirements #462

merged 12 commits into from
Mar 1, 2022

Conversation

ascjones
Copy link
Contributor

@ascjones ascjones commented Feb 23, 2022 •
edited
Loading

It seems this will also need releasing all the substrate deps again with the matching requirements 🙈

@jsdw
Copy link
Collaborator

jsdw commented Feb 23, 2022

The dynamic bitvec decoding bits will need a small update as well (see

subxt/subxt/src/events.rs

Line 644 in 70d83fe

consume_type::<BitVec<Lsb0, u8>>(input)
)

This will close #422 also once working.

@ascjones
Copy link
Contributor Author

Also releasing the substrate deps is blocked on paritytech/substrate#10825

@jsdw jsdw mentioned this pull request Feb 23, 2022
Closed
@ascjones ascjones mentioned this pull request Feb 25, 2022
Closed
@ascjones
Copy link
Contributor Author

ascjones commented Feb 28, 2022 •
edited
Loading

PR for releasing sp-* crates paritytech/substrate#10937

@jsdw jsdw self-requested a review March 1, 2022 16:35
@ascjones ascjones merged commit 11f24d7 into master Mar 1, 2022
@ascjones ascjones deleted the update-scale-deps branch March 1, 2022 16:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@cmichi cmichi cmichi approved these changes

@jsdw jsdw jsdw approved these changes

@niklasad1 niklasad1 niklasad1 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@ascjones @jsdw @cmichi @niklasad1