Add additional integration tests

[evilrobot-01]

Adds an integration test for an asset teleport, based on XCM workshop slides.

Currently blocked by the following pull requests, which enable additional checks on events, queries and asserts:

• Support multiple events of same type parachains-integration-tests#73
• Support selection of nested value within query result parachains-integration-tests#75
• Support multiple asserts of same type parachains-integration-tests#77
• Simple value asserts parachains-integration-tests#78

[bernardoaraujor]

Perhaps this PR could also cover #80 ?
That way, all the cases present in the XCM workshop slides would be covered.

[evilrobot-01]

Thats what I was hopefully working towards to tackle #53, basing it on the test you originally wrote so I could get familiar with the process and inner workings, but then also have something formal in place so we can easily check things over time as Trappist evolves (or Polkadot is updated).

Sounds like you may have solved #53 with #80, so will take a look at it next.

FYI - for reference, my implementation of the reserve-transfer test based on the XCM workshop slides is currently at https://github.com/paritytech/parachains-integration-tests/blob/frank/trappist/examples/trappist/1_reserve_transfer.yml, which is effectively now the same as yours after learning of the asset registry last night. 🙂

[bernardoaraujor]

I had forgotten about #53, perhaps #80 could have simply been appended to it as comments. My bad.

Anyways, I don't have a working solution for #80 yet, feel free to go for it!

In reference to #53, I'd suggest to add chain = "penpal-kusama-3000" to xcm-playground.toml (ref)

that should be a simple solution to the issue of "Rococo Parachain Local" (runtime currently being loaded into parachain 3000) not having an XCM Config.

[bernardoaraujor]

after #78 I think chain = "penpal-kusama-3000" is no longer necessary, since parachain 3000 now has its own runtime with a proper XCM Config.

[evilrobot-01]

Working with base-collator from latest master, thanks!

[hbulgarini]

@stiiifff what should we do with this PR that got opened for quite a while?

[evilrobot-01]

I'll close it, as it was dependent on some improvements to the parachains-integration-tests tool which never got merged.