-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 86
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
Showing
2 changed files
with
7 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ tmp.* | |
*.core | ||
*.o | ||
*.o2 | ||
*.class | ||
#*.jar | ||
*.a | ||
*.old* | ||
*.bak* | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
711c27b
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note: I'm collecting an update to ln_jscheme, webview (both bugs due to the assumption that onCreate was a one-time call) a recreated androidforegroundservice and a few minor things (possibly segfaults and memory leaks in JNI) into PRs right now.
Today or tomorrow I'd guess they will be ready to go.
711c27b
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK. Todays PRs are now feature complete.
I will now re-test.
711c27b
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While I'm testing... iff the conclusions I'm currently drawing from the profile data I'm looking at. Well, if this turns out to be true; let's say I'm surprised! At least, that is.
711c27b
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can always release a v1.1.2 quickly as this one is already tagged.
711c27b
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, but why tag a broken version when the fix is in the queue?
711c27b
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
BTW
this we better leave for the next version: 0-8-15@f0e039f
edited: update to link to comments wrt. line 42.
711c27b
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, happy to consider that for the next release when it comes in a pull request. Thanks.
711c27b
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Its a limitation of how release management works in GitHub (or git). I don't think I move tags forward to new places?
711c27b
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.