-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 65
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Converting the Conventions page to markdown (#777)
* Setting up Markdown support * Convert Conventions page to markdown * Attempt to use auto-generated labels
- Loading branch information
Showing
5 changed files
with
282 additions
and
247 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,260 @@ | ||
# Conventions | ||
|
||
## States and Bases | ||
|
||
### Bases | ||
|
||
A basis refers to a set of two eigenstates. The transition between | ||
these two states is said to be addressed by a channel that targets that basis. Namely: | ||
|
||
```{eval-rst} | ||
.. list-table:: | ||
:align: center | ||
:widths: 50 35 35 | ||
:header-rows: 1 | ||
* - Basis | ||
- Eigenstates | ||
- ``Channel`` type | ||
* - ``ground-rydberg`` | ||
- :math:`|g\rangle,~|r\rangle` | ||
- ``Rydberg`` | ||
* - ``digital`` | ||
- :math:`|g\rangle,~|h\rangle` | ||
- ``Raman`` | ||
* - ``XY`` | ||
- :math:`|0\rangle,~|1\rangle` | ||
- ``Microwave`` | ||
``` | ||
|
||
### Qutrit state | ||
|
||
The qutrit state combines the basis states of the `ground-rydberg` and `digital` bases, | ||
which share the same ground state, $|g\rangle$. This qutrit state comes into play | ||
in the digital approach, where the qubit state is encoded in $|g\rangle$ and | ||
$|h\rangle$ but then the Rydberg state $|r\rangle$ is accessed in multi-qubit | ||
gates. | ||
|
||
The qutrit state's basis vectors are defined as: | ||
|
||
$$ | ||
|r\rangle = (1, 0, 0)^T,~~|g\rangle = (0, 1, 0)^T, ~~|h\rangle = (0, 0, 1)^T. | ||
$$ | ||
|
||
### Qubit states | ||
|
||
:::{caution} | ||
There is no implicit relationship between a state's vector representation and its | ||
associated measurement value. To see the measurement value of a state for each | ||
measurement basis, see {ref}`spam-table` . | ||
::: | ||
|
||
When using only the `ground-rydberg` or `digital` basis, the qutrit state is not | ||
needed and is thus reduced to a qubit state. This reduction is made simply by tracing-out | ||
the extra basis state, so we obtain | ||
|
||
- `ground-rydberg`: $|r\rangle = (1, 0)^T,~~|g\rangle = (0, 1)^T$ | ||
- `digital`: $|g\rangle = (1, 0)^T,~~|h\rangle = (0, 1)^T$ | ||
|
||
On the other hand, the `XY` basis uses an independent set of qubit states that are | ||
labelled $|0\rangle$ and $|1\rangle$ and follow the standard convention: | ||
|
||
- `XY`: $|0\rangle = (1, 0)^T,~~|1\rangle = (0, 1)^T$ | ||
|
||
### Multi-partite states | ||
|
||
The combined quantum state of multiple atoms respects their order in the `Register`. | ||
For a register with ordered atoms `(q0, q1, q2, ..., qn)`, the full quantum state will be | ||
|
||
$$ | ||
|q_0, q_1, q_2, ...\rangle = |q_0\rangle \otimes |q_1\rangle \otimes |q_2\rangle \otimes ... \otimes |q_n\rangle | ||
$$ | ||
|
||
:::{note} | ||
The atoms may be labelled arbitrarily without any inherent order, it's only the | ||
order with which they are stored in the `Register` (as returned by | ||
`Register.qubit_ids`) that matters . | ||
::: | ||
|
||
|
||
## State Preparation and Measurement | ||
|
||
```{eval-rst} | ||
.. list-table:: Initial State and Measurement Conventions | ||
:name: spam-table | ||
:align: center | ||
:widths: 60 40 75 | ||
:header-rows: 1 | ||
* - Basis | ||
- Initial state | ||
- Measurement | ||
* - ``ground-rydberg`` | ||
- :math:`|g\rangle` | ||
- | | ||
| :math:`|r\rangle \rightarrow 1` | ||
| :math:`|g\rangle,|h\rangle \rightarrow 0` | ||
* - ``digital`` | ||
- :math:`|g\rangle` | ||
- | | ||
| :math:`|h\rangle \rightarrow 1` | ||
| :math:`|g\rangle,|r\rangle \rightarrow 0` | ||
* - ``XY`` | ||
- :math:`|0\rangle` | ||
- | | ||
| :math:`|1\rangle \rightarrow 1` | ||
| :math:`|0\rangle \rightarrow 0` | ||
``` | ||
|
||
### Measurement samples order | ||
|
||
Measurement samples are returned as a sequence of 0s and 1s, in | ||
the same order as the atoms in the `Register` and in the multi-partite state. | ||
|
||
For example, a four-qutrit state $|q_0, q_1, q_2, q_3\rangle$ that's | ||
projected onto $|g, r, h, r\rangle$ when measured will record a count to | ||
sample | ||
|
||
- `0101`, if measured in the `ground-rydberg` basis | ||
- `0010`, if measured in the `digital` basis | ||
|
||
## Hamiltonians | ||
|
||
Independently of the mode of operation, the Hamiltonian describing the system | ||
can be written as | ||
|
||
$$ | ||
H(t) = \sum_i \left (H^D_i(t) + \sum_{j<i}H^\text{int}_{ij} \right), | ||
$$ | ||
|
||
where $H^D_i$ is the driving Hamiltonian for atom $i$ and | ||
$H^\text{int}_{ij}$ is the interaction Hamiltonian between atoms $i$ | ||
and $j$. Note that, if multiple basis are addressed, there will be a | ||
corresponding driving Hamiltonian for each transition. | ||
|
||
### Driving Hamiltonian | ||
|
||
The driving Hamiltonian describes the coherent excitation of an individual atom | ||
between two energies levels, $|a\rangle$ and $|b\rangle$, with | ||
Rabi frequency $\Omega(t)$, detuning $\delta(t)$ and phase $\phi(t)$. | ||
|
||
:::{figure} files/two_level_ab.png | ||
:align: center | ||
:alt: The energy levels for the driving Hamiltonian. | ||
:width: 200 | ||
|
||
The coherent excitation is driven between a lower energy level, $|a\rangle$, and a higher energy level, | ||
$|b\rangle$, with Rabi frequency $\Omega(t)$ and detuning $\delta(t)$. | ||
::: | ||
|
||
:::{warning} | ||
In this form, the Hamiltonian is **independent of the state vector representation of each basis state**, | ||
but it still assumes that $|b\rangle$ **has a higher energy than** $|a\rangle$. | ||
::: | ||
|
||
$$ | ||
H^D(t) / \hbar = \frac{\Omega(t)}{2} e^{-i\phi(t)} |a\rangle\langle b| + \frac{\Omega(t)}{2} e^{i\phi(t)} |b\rangle\langle a| - \delta(t) |b\rangle\langle b| | ||
$$ | ||
|
||
#### Pauli matrix form | ||
|
||
A more conventional representation of the driving Hamiltonian uses Pauli operators | ||
instead of projectors. However, this form now **depends on the state vector definition** | ||
of $|a\rangle$ and $|b\rangle$. | ||
|
||
##### Pulser's state-vector definition | ||
|
||
In Pulser, we consistently define the state vectors according to their relative energy. | ||
In this way we have, for any given basis, that | ||
|
||
$$ | ||
|b\rangle = (1, 0)^T,~~|a\rangle = (0, 1)^T | ||
$$ | ||
|
||
Thus, the Pauli and excited state occupation operators are defined as | ||
|
||
$$ | ||
\hat{\sigma}^x = |a\rangle\langle b| + |b\rangle\langle a|, \\ | ||
\hat{\sigma}^y = i|a\rangle\langle b| - i|b\rangle\langle a|, \\ | ||
\hat{\sigma}^z = |b\rangle\langle b| - |a\rangle\langle a| \\ | ||
\hat{n} = |b\rangle\langle b| = (1 + \sigma_z) / 2 | ||
$$ | ||
|
||
and the driving Hamiltonian takes the form | ||
|
||
$$ | ||
H^D(t) / \hbar = \frac{\Omega(t)}{2} \cos\phi(t) \hat{\sigma}^x | ||
- \frac{\Omega(t)}{2} \sin\phi(t) \hat{\sigma}^y | ||
- \delta(t) \hat{n} | ||
$$ | ||
|
||
##### Alternative state-vector definition | ||
|
||
Outside of Pulser, the alternative definition for the basis state | ||
vectors might be taken: | ||
|
||
$$ | ||
|a\rangle = (1, 0)^T,~~|b\rangle = (0, 1)^T | ||
$$ | ||
|
||
This changes the operators and Hamiltonian definitions, | ||
as rewriten below with highlighted differences. | ||
|
||
$$ | ||
\hat{\sigma}^x = |a\rangle\langle b| + |b\rangle\langle a|, \\ | ||
\hat{\sigma}^y = \textcolor{red}{-}i|a\rangle\langle b| \textcolor{red}{+}i|b\rangle\langle a|, \\ | ||
\hat{\sigma}^z = \textcolor{red}{-}|b\rangle\langle b| \textcolor{red}{+} |a\rangle\langle a| \\ | ||
\hat{n} = |b\rangle\langle b| = (1 \textcolor{red}{-} \sigma_z) / 2 | ||
$$ | ||
|
||
$$ | ||
H^D(t) / \hbar = \frac{\Omega(t)}{2} \cos\phi(t) \hat{\sigma}^x | ||
\textcolor{red}{+}\frac{\Omega(t)}{2} \sin\phi(t) \hat{\sigma}^y | ||
- \delta(t) \hat{n} | ||
$$ | ||
|
||
:::{note} | ||
A common case for the use of this alternative definition arises when | ||
trying to reconcile the basis states of the `ground-rydberg` basis | ||
(where $|r\rangle$ is the higher energy level) with the | ||
computational-basis state-vector convention, thus ending up with | ||
|
||
$$ | ||
|0\rangle = |g\rangle = |a\rangle = (1, 0)^T,~~|1\rangle = |r\rangle = |b\rangle = (0, 1)^T | ||
$$ | ||
::: | ||
|
||
### Interaction Hamiltonian | ||
|
||
The interaction Hamiltonian depends on the states involved in the sequence. | ||
When working with the `ground-rydberg` and `digital` bases, atoms interact | ||
when they are in the Rydberg state $|r\rangle$: | ||
|
||
$$ | ||
H^\text{int}_{ij} = \frac{C_6}{R_{ij}^6} \hat{n}_i \hat{n}_j | ||
$$ | ||
|
||
where $\hat{n}_i = |r\rangle\langle r|_i$ (the projector of | ||
atom $i$ onto the Rydberg state), $R_{ij}^6$ is the distance | ||
between atoms $i$ and $j$ and $C_6$ is a coefficient | ||
depending on the specific Rydberg level of $|r\rangle$. | ||
|
||
On the other hand, with the two Rydberg states of the `XY` | ||
basis, the interaction Hamiltonian takes the form | ||
|
||
$$ | ||
H^\text{int}_{ij} = \frac{C_3}{R_{ij}^3} (\hat{\sigma}_i^{+}\hat{\sigma}_j^{-} + \hat{\sigma}_i^{-}\hat{\sigma}_j^{+}) | ||
$$ | ||
|
||
where $C_3$ is a coefficient that depends on the chosen Ryberg states | ||
and | ||
|
||
$$ | ||
\hat{\sigma}_i^{+} = |1\rangle\langle 0|_i,~~~\hat{\sigma}_i^{-} = |0\rangle\langle 1|_i | ||
$$ | ||
|
||
:::{note} | ||
The definitions given for both interaction Hamiltonians are independent of the chosen state vector convention. | ||
::: |
Oops, something went wrong.