Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sequence sampler feature extension #349

Closed
3 of 4 tasks
lvignoli opened this issue Mar 22, 2022 · 11 comments
Closed
3 of 4 tasks

Sequence sampler feature extension #349

lvignoli opened this issue Mar 22, 2022 · 11 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers
Milestone

Comments

@lvignoli
Copy link
Collaborator

lvignoli commented Mar 22, 2022

The sequence sampler added by #345 deserves the following features

  • a notebook to demonstrate its use and extend the User Guide
  • multiple output format: for now it give only the nested dict form required by the simulation module
  • a better way to specify the sampling-related noises
  • add the possibility to specify the sampling rate

It would then be possible to use it in the simulation module and the _seq_drawer() function.

@lvignoli lvignoli added enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers labels Mar 22, 2022
@lvignoli lvignoli added this to the v0.6 Release milestone Apr 5, 2022
@HGSilveri HGSilveri modified the milestones: v0.6 Release, v0.7 Release May 10, 2022
@arthurfaria
Copy link

I would like to work in this issue

@lvignoli
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hi @arthurfaria! Thank you for your interest. The sampler is currently being reworked in PR #388, so this issue is not up do date.
We'll update the sampler-related issue after #388, you might be interesting in working on it after that 😃.

@HGSilveri
Copy link
Collaborator

HGSilveri commented Jul 20, 2022

Very cool to know you're interested, @arthurfaria ! It is as @lvignoli says, we're currently reworking the sampler. I can always ping you once that's done.

This issue actually encompasses multiple working points, are you interested in any one in particular?

@arthurfaria
Copy link

Hi @HGSilveri and @lvignoli, thanks for the reply. Well, right now I am more interested in the simple ones. I have lately grown very interested in your open-source and working on an open good first issue would help me very much to grasp better the ideas behind it. So among those tasks, which one do you think is the best to start with?

@HGSilveri
Copy link
Collaborator

Excellent idea! Where to start will depend mostly on your current experience. In general, I would probably recommend writing the notebook because it will only require that you understand the code and use it. What do you think @lvignoli ?

Alternatively, I think issue #135 would make for an interesting entry point as well.

@lvignoli
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Sure, writing an example notebook is the obvious entry point to the code.
Probably #135 is a safer route, since it does not rely on current WIP.
In any case @arthurfaria your contributions are welcomed 🙂.

@arthurfaria
Copy link

alright! thanks a lot

@HGSilveri
Copy link
Collaborator

HGSilveri commented Aug 3, 2022

@arthurfaria Can you please leave a comment on issue #367 so that I can assign it to you?

@arthurfaria
Copy link

Of course: Hi!

@HGSilveri
Copy link
Collaborator

Of course: Hi!

Thanks, but can you do it on that issue #367 instead? It is more focused on what you'll be doing

@HGSilveri
Copy link
Collaborator

Update on this issue:

With that being said, I think we can consider this issue concluded, so I'll close it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants