Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow modification of the EOM setpoint without disabling EOM mode #708

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 23, 2024

Conversation

HGSilveri
Copy link
Collaborator

@HGSilveri HGSilveri commented Jul 10, 2024

This turned out to be easier than I first expected. By reusing existing methods as much as possible, there was no need to modify internal logic and the modulation seems to work without need for changes too.

  • Implements Sequence.modify_eom_setpoint()
  • Updates the abstract representation schema to support this new instruction

@HGSilveri HGSilveri requested a review from a-corni July 10, 2024 14:00
@HGSilveri HGSilveri added this to the Pulser v1 milestone Jul 11, 2024
@HGSilveri HGSilveri self-assigned this Jul 17, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@a-corni a-corni left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me :) I let you add the schema !

@HGSilveri HGSilveri marked this pull request as ready for review July 23, 2024 08:30
@HGSilveri HGSilveri merged commit 03fbb6e into develop Jul 23, 2024
7 checks passed
@HGSilveri HGSilveri mentioned this pull request Sep 20, 2024
HGSilveri added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2024
**Main changes:**
- Reworking the NoiseModel interface (#710)
- Allow modification of the EOM setpoint without disabling EOM mode (#708)
- Enable definition of effective noise operators in all basis (#716)
- Add leakage (#720)
- Support differentiability through Torch tensors (#703)
- Add from_abstract_repr to Device and VirtualDevice (#727) 
- [FEAT] Handle batches with partial results (#707)
- Add open batches to pulser-pasqal (#701)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants