Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat/content preservation #1406

Merged
merged 28 commits into from
Jun 15, 2023
Merged

Feat/content preservation #1406

merged 28 commits into from
Jun 15, 2023

Conversation

paulcwarren
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@paulcwarren paulcwarren force-pushed the feat/content-preservation branch 11 times, most recently from 801a07c to 74ce99e Compare May 12, 2023 03:29
…th content length and overwriteExistingContent

- implement in filesystem storage module
- it breaks backward compatibility
- I think each build is getting a new key because the pom hash is probably different
c
i: dont restore the cache for the build job, just save it

- otherwise the save fails with a 'already creating' error
- as does ContentStoreAware interface optionally implemented by fragments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant