Insert additional inputs at random index #40
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
DanGould
force-pushed
the
rand-input-insert
branch
from
f29c5ec to
3061dbb
Compare
|
This may run into the same issues as bitcoindevkit/bdk#871 when we integrate wasm. We could remove the dependency on |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Bip78 says re: payjoin proposal: "the additional outputs or additional inputs must be inserted at a random index."
I think it's curious that additional outputs are mentioned. Some people think of payjoins as having exactly two outputs and not a batch of them.