-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 500
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add AdvancedStatefulSet feature #1108
Conversation
/run-e2e-in-kind |
/run-e2e-in-kind |
spec: | ||
containers: | ||
- name: advanced-statefulset-controller | ||
image: quay.io/cofyc/advanced-statefulset:latest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we put this under pingcap now? Including the github repo?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, when this solution works well
/run-e2e-in-kind |
/run-e2e-in-kind |
2 similar comments
/run-e2e-in-kind |
/run-e2e-in-kind |
/run-e2e-in-kind |
kind: RoleBinding | ||
metadata: | ||
name: advanced-statefulset-controller | ||
namespace: kube-system |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why this ns is kube-system
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
testing only, this controller does not support specifying namespace (working on it)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
updated
/run-e2e-in-kind |
/run-e2e-in-kind |
4 similar comments
/run-e2e-in-kind |
/run-e2e-in-kind |
/run-e2e-in-kind |
/run-e2e-in-kind |
13d75c9
to
4fcb16e
Compare
/run-e2e-in-kind |
3b5ccbd
to
9c7d6fd
Compare
/run-e2e-in-kind |
/run-e2e-in-kind |
hack/kind-cluster-build.sh
Outdated
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ done | |||
clusterName=${clusterName:-kind} | |||
nodeNum=${nodeNum:-6} | |||
k8sVersion=${k8sVersion:-v1.12.8} | |||
volumeNum=${volumeNum:-9} | |||
volumeNum=${volumeNum:-32} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
able to run e2e tests in a small cluster
charts/tidb-operator/values.yaml
Outdated
# This will default to matching your kubernetes version | ||
# kubeSchedulerImageTag: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should these comments be removed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, thanks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fixed
/run-e2e-in-kind |
1 similar comment
/run-e2e-in-kind |
/run-e2e-in-kind |
3 similar comments
/run-e2e-in-kind |
/run-e2e-in-kind |
/run-e2e-in-kind |
/run-e2e-in-kind |
/run-e2e-in-kind |
/run-e2e-in-kind |
/run-e2e-in-kind |
@tennix @weekface @DanielZhangQD @onlymellb PTAL again. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
/run-e2e-in-kind |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
What problem does this PR solve?
fixes #1094
What is changed and how does it work?
Check List
Tests
Code changes
Side effects
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: