Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unified Distributed Parallel Execution Framework #41495

Closed
42 of 45 tasks
zimulala opened this issue Feb 16, 2023 · 0 comments
Closed
42 of 45 tasks

Unified Distributed Parallel Execution Framework #41495

zimulala opened this issue Feb 16, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
type/feature-request Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. type/new-feature

Comments

@zimulala
Copy link
Contributor

zimulala commented Feb 16, 2023

Feature Request

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe:

In the first phase, we implemented a concise distributed DDL processing framework. In the second phase, I hope to change this framework to be more general, so that more functions (currently TTL and Import, etc.) can be connected, so as to achieve a unified distributed parallel execution framework.

Development Plan

  • Identify common architectural interfaces docs
  • Each module design document
  • Design doc #43010

Each module Plan

Util

Handle

Storage
Scheduler
Dispatcher
Client
Example
  • add a test that can run the simplest logical flow normally
DDL
Import
system variables

Test Plan

  • Test plan document
@zimulala zimulala added the type/feature-request Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Feb 16, 2023
This was referenced Jul 18, 2023
ti-chi-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 1, 2023
ti-chi-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 7, 2023
@zimulala zimulala closed this as completed Feb 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type/feature-request Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. type/new-feature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant