-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
statistics: remove useless code #49206
statistics: remove useless code #49206
Conversation
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #49206 +/- ##
================================================
+ Coverage 70.9128% 71.1148% +0.2019%
================================================
Files 1368 1430 +62
Lines 395546 418097 +22551
================================================
+ Hits 280493 297329 +16836
- Misses 95394 101978 +6584
+ Partials 19659 18790 -869
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
@@ -252,11 +252,6 @@ const ( | |||
// AnalyzeFlag is set when the statistics comes from analyze. | |||
const AnalyzeFlag = 1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe we can mark this as deprecated. It seems that nothing depends on it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Now he is just expressing a placeholder, and there is no other use for it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Then we can mark it as deprecated. No need to care about it in code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But it has been as flag into the system table. system table is hard to change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It should be marked as deprecated with Deprecated: the reason why we don't need it.
comment syntax instead of removing it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have reuse this variable to replace the magic code.
3586c1d
to
adf094e
Compare
Signed-off-by: Weizhen Wang <wangweizhen@pingcap.com>
adf094e
to
43d1a10
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me. Thanks! 👍
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: hi-rustin, winoros The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #xxx
Problem Summary:
What changed and how does it work?
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.