-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
planner: fix the incorrect judgment of correlated column in the having clause (#51849) #53098
planner: fix the incorrect judgment of correlated column in the having clause (#51849) #53098
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Weizhen Wang <wangweizhen@pingcap.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
[LGTM Timeline notifier]Timeline:
|
/retest |
Signed-off-by: Weizhen Wang <wangweizhen@pingcap.com>
Signed-off-by: Weizhen Wang <wangweizhen@pingcap.com>
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: hawkingrei The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
416161d
into
pingcap:release-6.5-20230625-v6.5.3
This is an automated cherry-pick of #51849
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #51107
Problem Summary:
What changed and how does it work?
the fields in the having clause should be a correlated column unrelated to select fields and group-by fields.
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.