-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 409
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support multi-disks for PageStorage #1128
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
The IOPS in StoragePool.meta_storage is almost the same as StoragePool.log_storage, though meta_storage requires less bandwidth. |
Now StoragePathPool only considers the used size when choosing disks for new DTFile/PageFile. It may make the data imbalance between different disks. |
I think we'd better use the list format in TOML instead of a string separated with ",". What's more, we should choose a path for DTFile/PageFile by the global free disk space instead of the used disk space of each storage. |
The configuration in |
Currently, we can only use one path to store a PageStorage. It causes much more IO pressure(from Delta and Region snapshots) for the first disk than other disks when TiFlash is deployed in multi-paths mode. And support multi-paths for PageStorage can distribute the IO pressures between all disks.
Tasks:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: