-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 409
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
flush cache before segment merge (#4955) #4967
flush cache before segment merge (#4955) #4967
Conversation
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
/rebuild |
3 similar comments
/rebuild |
/rebuild |
/rebuild |
/merge |
@lidezhu: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests: /run-all-tests You only need to trigger If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: fa8b8ba
|
lines: 35.9% (42808 out of 119319) |
@ti-chi-bot: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you. At the same time I will also trigger all tests for you: /run-all-tests If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
lines: 36.0% (42906 out of 119332) |
/merge |
@lidezhu: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests: /run-all-tests You only need to trigger If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: 0aa9e1f
|
0aa9e1f
to
8f9a6f5
Compare
/merge |
@lidezhu: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests: /run-all-tests You only need to trigger If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: 8f9a6f5
|
8f9a6f5
to
b70e851
Compare
/merge |
@lidezhu: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests: /run-all-tests You only need to trigger If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: b70e851
|
lines: 35.9% (42818 out of 119333) |
This is an automated cherry-pick of #4955
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #4956
Problem Summary:
When do segment split, we try to copy the tail column files in the delta layer of the original segment to the new result
segments. So the new segments may contain data that doesn't belong to its segment range.
And this is ok for most cases, because the redundant data will be filtered out by the segment range when serve the read requests to the segment. So the redundant is invisible in almost all cases.
But when do segment merge later, if the previous redundant data is still not flushed to disk, it will be directly copied to the new merged segment again.
So the redundant data in each segment become visible again after segment merge which may cause potential data incorrectness.
What is changed and how it works?
Flush cache before every merge operation. So the potential unsaved data will be filtered out by the segment range when do merge.
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note