-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 287
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
kv(ticdc): fix data loss when upstream txn conflicts during scan (#5477) #5544
kv(ticdc): fix data loss when upstream txn conflicts during scan (#5477) #5544
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Neil Shen <overvenus@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Neil Shen <overvenus@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Neil Shen <overvenus@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ling Jin <7138436+3AceShowHand@users.noreply.github.com>
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has not been approved. To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. |
/merge |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: fa85934
|
/run-leak-test |
This is an automated cherry-pick of #5477
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #5468
What is changed and how it works?
Do not match prewrite and commit util it receives init event.
See more in #5468
Check List
Tests
Will it cause performance regression or break compatibility?
It caches more events in memory during incremental scan, it cause OOM when upstream workload is write-heavy.
Do you need to update user documentation, design documentation or monitoring documentation?
No.
Release note