cluster,dm: auto detect cpu arch

[9547]

What problem does this PR solve?

Implement #1397

What is changed and how it works?

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
• No code

Code changes

• Has exported function/method change
• Has exported variable/fields change
• Has interface methods change
• Has persistent data change

Side effects

• Possible performance regression
• Increased code complexity
• Breaking backward compatibility

Related changes

• Need to cherry-pick to the release branch
• Need to update the documentation

Release notes:

NONE

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #1423 (acc63e6) into master (342f044) will increase coverage by 16.85%.
The diff coverage is 65.21%.

❗ Current head acc63e6 differs from pull request most recent head e6cab3c. Consider uploading reports for the commit e6cab3c to get more accurate results

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1423       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   25.29%   42.14%   +16.85%     
===========================================
  Files         264      288       +24     
  Lines       20660    22590     +1930     
===========================================
+ Hits         5226     9521     +4295     
+ Misses      14631    11547     -3084     
- Partials      803     1522      +719     

Flag	Coverage Δ
cluster	28.54% <52.74%> (?)
integrate	36.03% <52.74%> (+20.58%)	⬆️
playground	13.70% <0.00%> (?)
tiup	15.42% <0.00%> (-0.04%)	⬇️
unittest	21.58% <13.04%> (-0.05%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
components/dm/spec/topology_dm.go	73.78% <0.00%> (-0.20%)	⬇️
pkg/cluster/manager/check.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
pkg/cluster/manager/deploy.go	65.53% <0.00%> (+65.53%)	⬆️
pkg/cluster/manager/scale_out.go	45.26% <42.85%> (+36.66%)	⬆️
pkg/cluster/spec/spec.go	75.61% <58.62%> (+17.70%)	⬆️
pkg/cluster/manager/manager.go	72.72% <77.77%> (+72.72%)	⬆️
pkg/cluster/ansible/import.go	39.04% <100.00%> (+0.84%)	⬆️
pkg/cluster/ansible/inventory.go	56.00% <100.00%> (+1.25%)	⬆️
pkg/cluster/operation/check.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
pkg/cluster/operation/scale_in.go	40.39% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 152 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 342f044...e6cab3c. Read the comment docs.

[AstroProfundis]

What if user specified an arch different with uname -m reports? e.g., user sets amd64 in the topology file, but the probe shows as aarch64. Will the topology changed by the probe result?

[9547]

What if user specified an arch different with uname -m reports? e.g., user sets amd64 in the topology file, but the probe shows as aarch64. Will the topology changed by the probe result?

We only detect those nodes whose arch was not specified.

[ti-chi-bot]

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

• AstroProfundis

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

[AstroProfundis]

/merge

[ti-chi-bot]

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: e6cab3c