Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Drop Java 8 #793

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 29, 2022
Merged

Drop Java 8 #793

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 29, 2022

Conversation

mkurz
Copy link
Member

@mkurz mkurz commented Sep 29, 2022

No description provided.

@mkurz mkurz merged commit a907033 into playframework:main Sep 29, 2022
@mkurz mkurz deleted the dropJava8 branch October 5, 2022 09:10
@cchantep
Copy link
Member

Hi,

Play-JSON 2.10.0 has just been published, I would have been pleased to upgrade to ... but as working a app that must run on Java 8 ...

We can considered that we have to upgrade ... JVM is a system component, and in some context it's not as easy ... compared to the fact that it has no cost for the Play JSON build ...

@mkurz
Copy link
Member Author

mkurz commented Sep 18, 2023

@cchantep Hmm... I think it's time to move on at some point? Java 8 was released almost 10 years ago. Some libraries started to drop Java 8 artifacts. Bigger frameworks like Spring, with version 6, even require Java 17 (!) already...
I do understand that there will always be organziations which follow a very conservative approach of upgrading software components, but at some point we have to make a cut IMHO.
Is it that hard for you/your organzation to upgrade to Java 11/Java 17? Like are you using some special Java 8 flags/workarounds etc.? Or is it "just" a matter of manpower, time and testing to perform a Java upgrade?

@cchantep
Copy link
Member

"Or is it "just" a matter of manpower, time and testing to perform a Java upgrade?" your argument can easily to reverted ... as the Java8 compatibility has no cost there.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants