Add check for L1 attributes transactions #172

AnkushinDaniil · 2024-08-22T16:57:43Z

Fixes #164

Summary by CodeRabbit

New Features
- Improved classification of deposit transactions by requiring Layer 1 attributes for validation.
- Introduced logic for handling Ethereum Layer 1 attributes, enhancing transaction validation and compliance.
Bug Fixes
- Enhanced transaction processing to ensure correct categorization of transactions based on new criteria.

coderabbitai · 2024-08-22T16:57:53Z

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

The changes introduce an enhanced classification for deposit transactions within the AdaptPayloadTxsToCosmosTxs function by incorporating a check for Layer 1 attributes. Additionally, a new file is introduced to manage Ethereum Layer 1 attributes, including the definition of a transaction structure and a validation function.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
adapters.go	Modified deposit transaction classification logic to include Layer 1 attributes check.
adapters_l1_attributes.go	Introduced `adapters_l1_attributes.go`, defining L1 attributes transaction structure and validation function.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Enforce `L1AttributesTx` in adapters (#164)	✅

🐰 In the code garden, changes take flight,
With L1 attributes shining so bright.
Transactions now clearer, deposits refined,
A hop towards structure, precision aligned.
Let's celebrate progress, a leap we behold,
In the world of adapters, new tales unfold! 🌟

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
- Generate unit testing code for this file.
- Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
- @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

@coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
@coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
@coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
@coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
@coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
@coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
@coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
@coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`)

You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

coderabbitai

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 97135d1 and 4d1cb2e.

Files selected for processing (2)

adapters.go (1 hunks)
adapters_l1_attributes.go (1 hunks)

Additional comments not posted (3)

adapters_l1_attributes.go (2)

11-23: Global variables for L1 attributes transactions are well-defined.

The use of global variables for constants related to L1 attributes transactions is appropriate in this context.

49-58: Verify the logic for identifying L1 attributes transactions.

The function checks various attributes to identify L1 attributes transactions. However, the comment indicates uncertainty about checking the From address. Consider clarifying or addressing this uncertainty.

adapters.go (1)

32-32: Enhanced validation for deposit transactions is well-implemented.

The additional check for L1 attributes transactions ensures stricter validation of deposit transactions.

Ensure that this change does not inadvertently exclude valid transactions. Consider reviewing test cases or adding new ones to cover this scenario.

AnkushinDaniil · 2024-08-23T09:53:14Z

@NiloCK
Could you please feedback on this PR?

adapters.go

adapters_l1_attributes.go

NiloCK · 2024-08-26T15:13:44Z

adapters_l1_attributes.go

+		return false
+	}
+
+	// TODO: Can we check From field?


I think so.

This tx ought to be prepared by the op-node, and populated according to the documented defaults (https://specs.optimism.io/protocol/deposits.html#l1-attributes-deposited-transaction).

Yes, but we don't have tx.From() and I can't find another method to extract it.

adapters_l1_attributes.go

adapters_l1_attributes_test.go

…Txs function

We need to work with Ecotone transactions, i.e. call `info.unmarshalBinaryEcotone(data)` in `L1BlockInfoFromBytes`

Add check for L1 attributes transactions

4d1cb2e

coderabbitai bot reviewed Aug 22, 2024

View reviewed changes

AnkushinDaniil marked this pull request as draft August 22, 2024 17:24