Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add check for L1 attributes transactions #172

Closed
wants to merge 8 commits into from
Closed

Add check for L1 attributes transactions #172

wants to merge 8 commits into from

Conversation

AnkushinDaniil
Copy link
Contributor

@AnkushinDaniil AnkushinDaniil commented Aug 22, 2024 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Fixes #164

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Improved classification of deposit transactions by requiring Layer 1 attributes for validation.
    • Introduced logic for handling Ethereum Layer 1 attributes, enhancing transaction validation and compliance.

  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced transaction processing to ensure correct categorization of transactions based on new criteria.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 22, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

The changes introduce an enhanced classification for deposit transactions within the AdaptPayloadTxsToCosmosTxs function by incorporating a check for Layer 1 attributes. Additionally, a new file is introduced to manage Ethereum Layer 1 attributes, including the definition of a transaction structure and a validation function.

Changes

Files Change Summary
adapters.go Modified deposit transaction classification logic to include Layer 1 attributes check.
adapters_l1_attributes.go Introduced adapters_l1_attributes.go, defining L1 attributes transaction structure and validation function.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Enforce L1AttributesTx in adapters (#164) ✅

🐰 In the code garden, changes take flight,
With L1 attributes shining so bright.
Transactions now clearer, deposits refined,
A hop towards structure, precision aligned.
Let's celebrate progress, a leap we behold,
In the world of adapters, new tales unfold! 🌟

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed Aug 22, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 97135d1 and 4d1cb2e.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • adapters.go (1 hunks)
  • adapters_l1_attributes.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
adapters_l1_attributes.go (2)

11-23: Global variables for L1 attributes transactions are well-defined.

The use of global variables for constants related to L1 attributes transactions is appropriate in this context.

49-58: Verify the logic for identifying L1 attributes transactions.

The function checks various attributes to identify L1 attributes transactions. However, the comment indicates uncertainty about checking the From address. Consider clarifying or addressing this uncertainty.

adapters.go (1)

32-32: Enhanced validation for deposit transactions is well-implemented.

The additional check for L1 attributes transactions ensures stricter validation of deposit transactions.

Ensure that this change does not inadvertently exclude valid transactions. Consider reviewing test cases or adding new ones to cover this scenario.

@AnkushinDaniil AnkushinDaniil marked this pull request as draft August 22, 2024 17:24
@AnkushinDaniil
Copy link
Contributor Author

@NiloCK
Could you please feedback on this PR?

NiloCK
NiloCK reviewed Aug 26, 2024
View reviewed changes
adapters.go Show resolved Hide resolved
NiloCK
NiloCK reviewed Aug 26, 2024
View reviewed changes
adapters_l1_attributes.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
NiloCK
NiloCK reviewed Aug 26, 2024
View reviewed changes
adapters_l1_attributes.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
NiloCK
NiloCK reviewed Aug 26, 2024
View reviewed changes
adapters_l1_attributes.go
return false
}

// TODO: Can we check From field?
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think so.

This tx ought to be prepared by the op-node, and populated according to the documented defaults (https://specs.optimism.io/protocol/deposits.html#l1-attributes-deposited-transaction).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, but we don't have tx.From() and I can't find another method to extract it.

NiloCK
NiloCK reviewed Aug 26, 2024
View reviewed changes
adapters_l1_attributes.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@AnkushinDaniil AnkushinDaniil force-pushed the l1-attributes-deposit-transaction branch from 5962db6 to fc39c28 Compare August 27, 2024 16:31
@joshklop joshklop closed this Nov 7, 2024
@AnkushinDaniil AnkushinDaniil deleted the l1-attributes-deposit-transaction branch November 8, 2024 05:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] left review comments

@NiloCK NiloCK NiloCK left review comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Enforce L1AttributesTx in adapters
3 participants
@AnkushinDaniil @NiloCK @joshklop