Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: include license detection support in bom workflows #589

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 31, 2024

Conversation

rchincha
Copy link
Contributor

Update the stacker-bom version to include this support.

What type of PR is this?

Which issue does this PR fix:

What does this PR do / Why do we need it:

If an issue # is not available please add repro steps and logs showing the issue:

Testing done on this change:

Automation added to e2e:

Will this break upgrades or downgrades?

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?:


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

Update the stacker-bom version to include this support.

Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Chinchani <rchincha@cisco.com>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (f53ad86) 57.15% compared to head (5732ab7) 57.15%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #589   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   57.15%   57.15%           
=======================================
  Files          64       64           
  Lines        7525     7525           
=======================================
  Hits         4301     4301           
  Misses       2481     2481           
  Partials      743      743           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@hallyn hallyn merged commit 3177e8d into project-stacker:main Jan 31, 2024
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants