-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[prometheus-rabbitmq-exporter] Create secret to store credentials when provided #5099
Merged
desaintmartin
merged 1 commit into
prometheus-community:main
from
jchanam:rabbitmq-exporter-create-secret
Dec 28, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ | ||
{{- if or (and (.Values.rabbitmq.password) (not .Values.rabbitmq.existingPasswordSecret)) (and (.Values.rabbitmq.user) (not .Values.rabbitmq.existingUserSecret)) }} | ||
apiVersion: v1 | ||
kind: Secret | ||
metadata: | ||
name: {{ template "prometheus-rabbitmq-exporter.fullname" . }} | ||
labels: | ||
app: {{ template "prometheus-rabbitmq-exporter.name" . }} | ||
chart: {{ template "prometheus-rabbitmq-exporter.chart" . }} | ||
release: {{ .Release.Name }} | ||
heritage: {{ .Release.Service }} | ||
{{- if .Values.additionalLabels }} | ||
{{ toYaml .Values.additionalLabels | indent 4 }} | ||
{{- end }} | ||
type: Opaque | ||
data: | ||
{{- if and (.Values.rabbitmq.password) (not .Values.rabbitmq.existingPasswordSecret) }} | ||
RABBIT_PASSWORD: {{ .Values.rabbitmq.password | b64enc }} | ||
{{- end }} | ||
{{- if and (.Values.rabbitmq.user) (not .Values.rabbitmq.existingUserSecret) }} | ||
RABBIT_USER: {{ .Values.rabbitmq.user | b64enc }} | ||
{{- end }} | ||
{{- end }} |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If
.Values.rabbitmq.password
is set but.Values.rabbitmq.existingPasswordSecret
is set as well, secret will not be created and Pod will never start. We should have a solution. Maybe we should prevent the two being set at the same time, or we align the condition in the two files, or we simply "ignore" the latter like it's done before this PR.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi!
Yes, you're right. If existing password secret is set, then we don't need to create the secret, as we'll be using the one provided in the values.
On that case, the secret where we're reading the value for the env is also the one provided, so I think the pod will be created and running.
This is an example of the env for the deployment on that case:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
About the options you mentioned, I followed what it was done before. If the existing secret is given, the password or user is ignored and the secret used.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am sorry, the diff bugged me, you are right!