Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DOCS] adding analyze service monitor docs #32

Merged

Conversation

nicolastakashi
Copy link
Collaborator

This pull request introduces a new documentation section for the analyze command, which is used to examine Prometheus Operator objects for compliance with specific rules. The new documentation provides a detailed overview of the command's usage, flags, and specific rules for analyzing ServiceMonitor objects.

Documentation updates:

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Takashi <nicolas.tcs@hotmail.com>
@nicolastakashi nicolastakashi force-pushed the docs/adding-analyze-svc-monnitor-command-doc-page branch from 41f44cc to fd4a692 Compare September 4, 2024 22:01
@nicolastakashi nicolastakashi requested review from ArthurSens and simonpasquier and removed request for ArthurSens and simonpasquier September 4, 2024 22:01
@nicolastakashi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I don't know why I can't set two reviewers :(
anyway cc @ArthurSens @simonpasquier

@ArthurSens
Copy link
Member

I don't know why I can't set two reviewers :( anyway cc @ArthurSens @simonpasquier

It's because it's a private repository and we don't pay Github enterprise 😬

Copy link
Collaborator

@simonpasquier simonpasquier left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@nicolastakashi nicolastakashi merged commit d089f11 into main Sep 6, 2024
4 checks passed
@nicolastakashi nicolastakashi deleted the docs/adding-analyze-svc-monnitor-command-doc-page branch September 17, 2024 19:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants