You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
the formal ProtoBuf specification, including the grammar, the serialization spec, the formal language independent API definitions, and the TCK;
the separate concrete language implementations based on the above, with their own maintenance and release schedule.
(optional, and desired) language specific ProtoBuf generators, at least for Java, in addition to the existing protoc.
This would leverage the language specific tools, libraries, and domains, allowing for better, easier, and faster maintenance and evolution.
In addition, regarding Java, it is time to get rid of Java 5, and, maybe, Java 6 support, making a really portable Maven project, with modern tests, and the updated source.
It is very easy to do - the separation could be done within hours! The benefits, IMHO, are huge.
Cheers,
David
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think it is long overdue to have the separate
This would leverage the language specific tools, libraries, and domains, allowing for better, easier, and faster maintenance and evolution.
In addition, regarding Java, it is time to get rid of Java 5, and, maybe, Java 6 support, making a really portable Maven project, with modern tests, and the updated source.
It is very easy to do - the separation could be done within hours! The benefits, IMHO, are huge.
Cheers,
David
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: