Fix GetBeaconBlock
to use skip-mev-boost
#12969
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR fixes issue #12950 where
GetBeaconBlock
in the beacon API does not correctly utilize theskip-mev-boost
parameter when making a call to the underlying prysm API.Background:
In the beacon API, there are distinct endpoints for requesting a full block or a blind block. However, the prysm API does not make this distinction, instead relying on a
skip-mev-boost
parameter. The issue arises because theskip-mev-boost
parameter was not being recognized or used within theGetBeaconBlock
function in the beacon API. Here is the beacon API request:Changes:
This PR rectifies this oversight by incorporating the
skip-mev-boost
parameter. When this parameter is set totrue
, the payload construction for MEV Boost is skipped, effectively mimicking the behavior as if an override builder was applied from the engine API.