Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

VC: Improve logging in case of fatal error #13681

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 4, 2024
Merged

VC: Improve logging in case of fatal error #13681

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 4, 2024

Conversation

nalepae
Copy link
Contributor

@nalepae nalepae commented Mar 1, 2024

What type of PR is this?
Other

What does this PR do? Why is it needed?
If running the VC with, for example, a non-existing --wallet-password-file, the most useful information (aka, the error message) is actually the less visible on the screen.

Example:

image

After this PR, the log message preventing the VC to run is displayed as FATAL.
image

NOTE: In such a case, the error code is still non-zero.

@nalepae nalepae requested a review from a team as a code owner March 1, 2024 09:19
@nalepae nalepae requested review from rkapka, nisdas and james-prysm March 1, 2024 09:19
@james-prysm james-prysm added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 1, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Mar 1, 2024
@nalepae nalepae added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 1, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to no response for status checks Mar 1, 2024
@nalepae nalepae added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 4, 2024
Merged via the queue into develop with commit 3df7a1f Mar 4, 2024
17 checks passed
@nalepae nalepae deleted the vc-fatal branch March 4, 2024 09:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants