Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

always close cache warm chan to prevent blocking #14080

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 4, 2024
Merged

always close cache warm chan to prevent blocking #14080

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
1c408f1
always close cache warm chan to prevent blocking
kasey Jun 4, 2024
f209870
test that waitForCache does not block
kasey Jun 4, 2024
a1bd0de
combine defers to reduce cognitive overhead
kasey Jun 4, 2024
8a75887
lint
kasey Jun 4, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
10 changes: 6 additions & 4 deletions beacon-chain/db/filesystem/pruner.go
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -93,13 +93,15 @@ func windowMin(latest, offset primitives.Slot) primitives.Slot {
func (p *blobPruner) warmCache() error {
p.Lock()
defer p.Unlock()
defer func() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

does the order of the defer above for unlock matter? I suppose if it unlocks here this other defer is updating p.warmed without the lock?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

defers are always LIFO, so this code is correct (unlock happens after the channel is closed). But, I did anticipate this might confuse someone and thought about putting the unlock in the other deferred function, so I think I'll go ahead and do that.

if !p.warmed {
p.warmed = true
close(p.cacheReady)
}
}()
if err := p.prune(0); err != nil {
return err
}
if !p.warmed {
p.warmed = true
close(p.cacheReady)
}
return nil
}

Expand Down
Loading