Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dataColumnsByRange: Sort data columns by index. #14542

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 16, 2024
Merged

Conversation

nalepae
Copy link
Contributor

@nalepae nalepae commented Oct 16, 2024

So we comply with the specification.

The following data column sidecars, where they exist, MUST be sent in (slot, column_index) order.

(Before, the order was undefined because coming from the iteration of a map.)

@nalepae nalepae requested a review from a team as a code owner October 16, 2024 12:45
@nalepae nalepae requested review from kasey, prestonvanloon and james-prysm and removed request for a team October 16, 2024 12:45
@nalepae nalepae merged commit cbe26ae into peerDAS Oct 16, 2024
14 of 16 checks passed
@nalepae nalepae deleted the peerDAS-sort-by-index branch October 16, 2024 15:35
nalepae added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2024
nalepae added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2024
nalepae added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2024
nalepae added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2024
nalepae added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2024
nalepae added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2024
nalepae added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2024
nalepae added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2024
nalepae added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2024
nalepae added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants