Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft policy plan 2024 #1401

Draft
wants to merge 30 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Draft policy plan 2024 #1401

wants to merge 30 commits into from

Conversation

clausmullie
Copy link
Member

@clausmullie clausmullie commented Nov 27, 2023

Ground work for draft policy plan for the board and general assembly to consider and continue developing on.

Updates old policy plan with changes made/proposed in #1371, #1346, #1345 & #1365

Merging #1400 first will help with readability

Consider how/where to archive existing plan before merging this #1088

* Enable global scale of stewardship by stewarding the top-of-class codebases in strategic public functions, and supporting other organizations to execute codebase stewardship.
* Widespread adoption of public code as a strategic priority for public organizations, enabled by a diverse set of publicly owned organizations that steward codebases.
* Fully publicly funded organizations able to operate in all time zones, and with regional experts.
* Fully publicly funded chapter organizations in most geographical regions, able to operate in all time zones, and with regional experts.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fully publicly funded seems ambitious!

ElenaFdR
ElenaFdR previously approved these changes Nov 30, 2023
Copy link
Member

@ElenaFdR ElenaFdR left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These changes all seem sensible and appropriate given other commitments/plans we've made. I've created #1411 to capture some future changes we should consider as soon as the new articles of association are adopted.

nebster
nebster previously approved these changes Nov 30, 2023
Copy link
Member

@nebster nebster left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this looks good as a starting point for discussion with General Assembly

@clausmullie clausmullie dismissed stale reviews from nebster and ElenaFdR via 0353c3b December 4, 2023 08:46
Co-authored-by: Elena Findley-de Regt <ElenaFdR@users.noreply.github.com>
@clausmullie
Copy link
Member Author

Ok great! Let's merge this once it has been edited and approved by the general assembly (and there has been a decision on how to archive the current one).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants