-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update on "Make Insights Table More Descriptive in Spam 2 #10959" issue #10967
Conversation
…0959" issue The "Make Insights Table More Descriptive in Spam 2 publiclab#10959" has been updated accordingly as was required.
Thanks for opening this pull request! This space is protected by our Code of Conduct - and we're here to help. |
Code Climate has analyzed commit 999b3e4 and detected 0 issues on this pull request. View more on Code Climate. |
This pull request generated screenshots of many common pages in the running app. You should be able to download and view them here: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @PiusKevin3. Great work!!
Congrats on merging your first pull request! 🙌🎉⚡️ Help others take their first stepNow that you've merged your first pull request, you're the perfect person to help someone else out with this challenging first step. 🙌 Try looking at this list of `first-timers-only` issues, and see if someone else is waiting for feedback, or even stuck! 😕 People often get stuck at the same steps, so you might be able to help someone get unstuck, or help lead them to some documentation that'd help. Reach out and be encouraging and friendly! 😄 🎉 Read about how to help support another newcomer here, or find other ways to offer mutual support here. |
Thank you, great work! |
The "Make Insights Table More Descriptive in Spam 2 #10959" has been updated accordingly as was required.
I have been able to change the anchor () tags of Unmoderated,Spammed,Flagged sectons and their corresponding list (
The issue number was #10959
Thanks!