Show more/less in grids

[Ankit-Singla]

Fixes #2150

Make sure these boxes are checked before your pull request is ready to be reviewed and merged. Thanks!

• all tests pass -- rake test:all
• code is in uniquely-named feature branch, and has been rebased on top of latest master (especially if you've been asked to make additional changes)
• pull request is descriptively named with #number reference back to original issue

Please be sure you've reviewed our contribution guidelines at https://publiclab.org/wiki/contributing-to-public-lab-software

We have a loose schedule of reviewing and pulling in changes every Tuesday and Friday, and publishing changes on Fridays. Please alert developers on plots-dev@googlegroups.com when your request is ready or if you need assistance.

Thanks!

[PublicLabBot]

	10 Errors
🚫	There was a test failure at: Failure: test_about_ability_of_power_tags_to_exclude_tags_like_activities:foo!foo1 [/app/test/unit/node_shared_test.rb:157]: Expected: 5 Actual: 4
🚫	There was a test failure at: Failure: test_about_ability_of_power_tags_to_exclude_tags_like_notes:test!awesome [/app/test/unit/node_shared_test.rb:125]: Expected: 5 Actual: 4
🚫	There was a test failure at: Failure: test_about_ability_of_power_tags_to_exclude_tags_like_questions:foo!answered [/app/test/unit/node_shared_test.rb:145]: Expected: 5 Actual: 4
🚫	There was a test failure at: Failure: test_about_ability_of_power_tags_to_exclude_tags_like_questions:foo!foo1 [/app/test/unit/node_shared_test.rb:135]: Expected: 5 Actual: 4
🚫	There was a test failure at: Failure: test_about_ability_of_power_tags_to_exclude_tags_like_upgrades:foo!foo1 [/app/test/unit/node_shared_test.rb:166]: Expected: 5 Actual: 4
🚫	There was a test failure at: Failure: test_that_NodeShared_can_be_used_to_convert_doubled_short_codes_like_[notes:activity:spectrometer]into_tables_which_list_notes_with_the_tagactivity:spectrometer(Minitest::Result) [/app/test/unit/node_shared_test.rb:25]: Expected: 5 Actual: 4
🚫	There was a test failure at: Failure: test_that_NodeShared_can_be_used_to_convert_short_codes_like_[activities:foo]_into_tables_which_list_activity_notes(Minitest::Result) [/app/test/unit/node_shared_test.rb:47]: Expected: 5 Actual: 4
🚫	There was a test failure at: Failure: test_that_NodeShared_can_be_used_to_convert_short_codes_like_[notes:foo]_into_tables_which_list_notes(Minitest::Result) [/app/test/unit/node_shared_test.rb:10]: Expected: 5 Actual: 4
🚫	There was a test failure at: Failure: test_that_NodeShared_can_be_used_to_convert_short_codes_like_[questions:foo]_into_tables_which_list_questions(Minitest::Result) [/app/test/unit/node_shared_test.rb:35]: Expected: 5 Actual: 4
🚫	There was a test failure at: Failure: test_that_NodeShared_can_be_used_to_convert_short_codes_like_[upgrades:latest]_into_tables_which_list_upgrade_notes(Minitest::Result) [/app/test/unit/node_shared_test.rb:57]: Expected: 5 Actual: 4

	3 Messages
📖	@Ankit-Singla Thank you for your pull request! I’m here to help with some tips and recommendations. Please take a look at the list provided and help us review and accept your contribution! And don’t be discouraged if you see errors – we’re here to help.
📖	This pull request doesn’t link to a issue number. Please refer to the issue it fixes (if any) in the body of your PR, in the format: Fixes #123.
📖	It looks like you haven’t marked all the checkboxes. Help us review and accept your suggested changes by going through the steps one by one. If it is still a ‘Work in progresss’, please include ‘[WIP]’ in the title.

Generated by 🚫 Danger

[SidharthBansal]

Please remove the user validation commits.

[Ankit-Singla]

@SidharthBansal I have made the required changes as you had asked. The PR is clean, with a single commit from a uniquely-named-feature-branch. Please review the PR.

[jywarren]

@SidharthBansal -- how was this looking, do you think it's something we could move ahead with? Thanks!!!

[SidharthBansal]

There must be changes to this. I think @Ankit-Singla has quit as he has not replied in the other PRS by him from Feb. The other PR's issues were tackled later on by other contributors at public lab.

[SidharthBansal]

Actually, my suggestion is to close this PR and look for other new comers to come and collaborate. If @Ankit-Singla would like to contribute he can reopen the PR.

[jywarren]

That's fair -- we'd love your help @Ankit-Singla -- thanks! We're going to close this for now but please reach out if you're able to take it back up. It looks very promising, though!

Thanks again!