Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add basic functionality for heat behavior #67

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 13, 2017

Conversation

ryzokuken
Copy link
Member

We need to merge #66 first though.

@ryzokuken ryzokuken self-assigned this Aug 10, 2017
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 10, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-3.04%) to 79.213% when pulling 8f93315 on ryzokuken:feature-chatops-temp into 9f8bd18 on publiclab:master.

@ryzokuken ryzokuken changed the title Feature chatops temp Add basic functionality for heat behavior Aug 10, 2017
@icarito
Copy link
Member

icarito commented Aug 10, 2017

Super!

@ryzokuken ryzokuken force-pushed the feature-chatops-temp branch from 8f93315 to a220641 Compare August 10, 2017 19:32
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 10, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 79.213% when pulling a220641 on ryzokuken:feature-chatops-temp into 80a570e on publiclab:master.

@ryzokuken
Copy link
Member Author

Done with regard to #65

@ananyo2012
Copy link
Member

This looks good. Once you are done with the tests we can merge this.

@ryzokuken
Copy link
Member Author

ryzokuken commented Aug 11, 2017 via email

@ananyo2012
Copy link
Member

With respect to the promise written in #66 just make a method that will mock the execution of the process and make the promise reject or resolve.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 13, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+2.9%) to 82.162% when pulling fb906db on ryzokuken:feature-chatops-temp into 80a570e on publiclab:master.

@ryzokuken ryzokuken merged commit b7a5e42 into publiclab:master Aug 13, 2017
@ananyo2012
Copy link
Member

Cleverly done!

@jywarren
Copy link
Member

This is a really good self-contained example of an entire behavior -- maybe we should link to this from the README as an example of everything you need to add a behavior?

@ryzokuken
Copy link
Member Author

@jywarren Sure, I will do that right now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants