Added tasks to rspec pattern.

[dylanratcliffe]

While I have yet to see anyone testing ruby tasks, I see no reason why we should prevent that.

[dylanratcliffe]

Also changed to alphabetical order

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #261 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #261   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   40.46%   40.46%           
=======================================
  Files          10       10           
  Lines         734      734           
=======================================
  Hits          297      297           
  Misses        437      437

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
lib/puppetlabs_spec_helper/rake_tasks.rb	41.79% <100%> (ø)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ba8780f...9bc2dfb. Read the comment docs.

[DavidS]

Looks good to me. @rodjek will this interfere with any (future) rspec-puppet task testing?

[puppetcla]

CLA signed by all contributors.

[rodjek]

@DavidS I currently have no plans in regards to implementing task specs in rspec-puppet. That said, if/when it does happen, that would be the path I'd choose to put them under anyway so 👍