Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add info about all types of fields supported by StorIO Annotation Processor #503

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 1, 2015

Conversation

artem-zinnatullin
Copy link
Member

Closes #497.

@nikitin-da PTAL :)

@@ -328,6 +328,8 @@ StorIOSQLite storIOSQLite = DefaultStorIOSQLite.builder()
.build(); // This instance of StorIOSQLite will know how to work with Tweet objects
```

BTW: [Here is a class](storio-sample-app/src/main/java/com/pushtorefresh/storio/sample/db/entities/AllSupportedTypes.java) with all types of fields, supported by StorIO SQLite Annotation Processor.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the link doesn't work from this directory

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, sure, my bad

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed!

@artem-zinnatullin artem-zinnatullin force-pushed the docs-annotation-processor-fields branch from 694b4e0 to baa5f31 Compare September 1, 2015 21:54
nikitin-da added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2015
…fields

Add info about all types of fields supported by StorIO Annotation Processor
@nikitin-da nikitin-da merged commit 64da82a into master Sep 1, 2015
@nikitin-da nikitin-da deleted the docs-annotation-processor-fields branch September 1, 2015 22:04
@nikitin-da
Copy link
Collaborator

Great!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants