Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Compile testing for StorIOContentResilverAnnotationsProccesor #761

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 18, 2017
Merged

Compile testing for StorIOContentResilverAnnotationsProccesor #761

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 18, 2017

Conversation

geralt-encore
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@nikitin-da
Copy link
Collaborator

Great work man! 👍

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Feb 18, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #761 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #761   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.05%   96.05%           
=======================================
  Files          87       87           
  Lines        2460     2460           
  Branches      267      267           
=======================================
  Hits         2363     2363           
  Misses         68       68           
  Partials       29       29

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ee9abf8...91ef896. Read the comment docs.

@nikitin-da
Copy link
Collaborator

@artem-zinnatullin would you like to read this request? Or maybe we can merge it, because it is similar to sqlite part in many respects.

Copy link
Member

@artem-zinnatullin artem-zinnatullin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

testCompile libraries.storIOContentResolver
testCompile libraries.storIOContentResolverAnnotationsProcessor
testCompile libraries.googleTestingCompile
testCompile files(getRuntimeJar())
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe move it to libraries declaration?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Dunno it's not really a library. I mean it doesn't have versioning so moving it to libraries won't give much profit I guess.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

well, technically it's a library, just a jar on your system. Point is to remove code duplication from build gradle, up2u though :)

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member

@artem-zinnatullin artem-zinnatullin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 👍 👍

@geralt-encore geralt-encore merged commit 6eb798d into pushtorefresh:master Feb 18, 2017
@geralt-encore geralt-encore deleted the compile-testing branch February 18, 2017 16:34
@geralt-encore
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Ouch, I forgot to squash a PR 😔

@artem-zinnatullin
Copy link
Member

That is my fault, don't blame yourself, I'll enable squash-only option in repo settings!

@geralt-encore
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I just got used to it as default option so didn't even check. But it's nice that that you enabled it now.

@artem-zinnatullin
Copy link
Member

Yeah, I know that feel bro, a month or so ago I've also merged PR in some of my repos without squashing because I got used to it as default option…

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants