-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 182
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix case with different classes having fields with the same names #803
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #803 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 96.99% 96.99%
=======================================
Files 89 89
Lines 2727 2727
Branches 302 302
=======================================
Hits 2645 2645
Misses 50 50
Partials 32 32 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good!
README.md
Outdated
@@ -189,6 +189,7 @@ public class Tweet { | |||
``` | |||
|
|||
-`Kotlin`: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
excess dash
@artem-zinnatullin @nikitin-da how about making a release with Kotlin related changes? Seems reasonable considering the fact of its growing popularity. |
@geralt-encore I agree that there is huge pack of changes and Kotlin changes required to release ASAP, but it seems RxJava2 support will break compatibility again. |
I see your point, but I have to concerns regarding it. First, it is not really a breaking API change - it is fixing something that was initially broken, so I think that the fact that something doesn't work in a broken way, which it was never supposed to work is a good thing. Second, we have zero ideas about the timeline of RxJava 2 support =( |
Unfortunately we have already merged interceptors and we should roll it back from master or release it with major version( |
Ouch, I completely forgot about interceptors change... Then, yeah, you are totally right. |
@nikitin-da yes, I think we can release v2 and then v3, that's what semantic versioning is for :) |
Ok, let's release v2 |
See #806 |
No description provided.