Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix case with different classes having fields with the same names #803

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 11, 2017
Merged

Fix case with different classes having fields with the same names #803

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 11, 2017

Conversation

geralt-encore
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jul 10, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #803 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #803   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.99%   96.99%           
=======================================
  Files          89       89           
  Lines        2727     2727           
  Branches      302      302           
=======================================
  Hits         2645     2645           
  Misses         50       50           
  Partials       32       32

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update be69efd...a6bb953. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Collaborator

@nikitin-da nikitin-da left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

README.md Outdated
@@ -189,6 +189,7 @@ public class Tweet {
```

-`Kotlin`:
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

excess dash

@geralt-encore
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@artem-zinnatullin @nikitin-da how about making a release with Kotlin related changes? Seems reasonable considering the fact of its growing popularity.

@geralt-encore geralt-encore merged commit 39b0a22 into pushtorefresh:master Jul 11, 2017
@nikitin-da
Copy link
Collaborator

@geralt-encore I agree that there is huge pack of changes and Kotlin changes required to release ASAP, but it seems RxJava2 support will break compatibility again.
It will lead to two major releases at once =(

@geralt-encore
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I see your point, but I have to concerns regarding it. First, it is not really a breaking API change - it is fixing something that was initially broken, so I think that the fact that something doesn't work in a broken way, which it was never supposed to work is a good thing. Second, we have zero ideas about the timeline of RxJava 2 support =(

@nikitin-da
Copy link
Collaborator

Unfortunately we have already merged interceptors and we should roll it back from master or release it with major version(
@artem-zinnatullin will it be ok to release fast v2 and v3?

@geralt-encore
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Ouch, I completely forgot about interceptors change... Then, yeah, you are totally right.

@artem-zinnatullin
Copy link
Member

@nikitin-da yes, I think we can release v2 and then v3, that's what semantic versioning is for :)

@nikitin-da
Copy link
Collaborator

Ok, let's release v2

@artem-zinnatullin
Copy link
Member

See #806

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants