-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding westfall-young p-value adjustment for multiple tests #725
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
pre-commit.ci autofix |
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
Thanks @marcandre259 , I'll review this evening! |
Hi, this looks very good, thank you @marcandre259! I left a tiny comment that I fixed myself =) I might also add some unit tests tomorrow and think again about the issue of RI vs the bootstrap you raised in the other PR. What is your current thinking on this at the moment? Do you think it is a bug, or are we being fooled by statistics? |
Thanks for looking into it @s3alfisc :) I can also add tests if needed. Regarding the (maybe) issue, for me what is weird is getting this super tight null distribution. I figure maybe I'm missing something. In any case, there are probably tons of randomization sampling programs out there to do comparisons, so if it's still hanging, I'll look into it this weekend. |
Actually there are tests for the SEs of the ritest t-stats and the lower bound of its ci implemented as well: Line 104 in ce4efd3
|
Now that I've found the ritest bug and fixed it in #730, I will take another look at this & implement some tests tomorrow evening. 👍 |
pre-commit.ci autofix |
And merged. Thanks so much @marcandre259! |
From closed pr #698
Takes in most of @s3alfisc review comments.
Tests are still a weak point.
Possible issue with Randomization Inference -> #717