We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Help is needed to diagnose and fix leak diagnostics that suddenly appeared due to unknown changes in the environment ("bit rot").
The log files are permanently archived here: https://github.com/rwgk/issues/tree/master/pybind11/issue_4889
Idea just in case nobody gets to this for a while: Simply try again, just in case the root cause is fixed upstream.
Problem:
============================= test session starts ============================== platform linux -- Python 3.9.18, pytest-7.2.0, pluggy-1.3.0 C++ Info: 9.4.0 C++17 __pybind11_internals_v4_gcc_libstdcpp_cxxabi1013__ PYBIND11_SIMPLE_GIL_MANAGEMENT=False rootdir: /home/runner/work/pybind11/pybind11/tests, configfile: pytest.ini plugins: timeout-2.2.0 timeout: 300.0s timeout method: signal timeout func_only: False collected [85](https://github.com/pybind/pybind11/actions/runs/6526472350/job/17720263281#step:13:86)7 items --[87](https://github.com/pybind/pybind11/actions/runs/6526472350/job/17720263281#step:13:88)78-- warning: evaluate_Dwarf3_Expr: unhandled DW_OP_ 0xf3 ... ../../tests/test_factory_constructors.py ............... [ 44%] ==[92](https://github.com/pybind/pybind11/actions/runs/6526472350/job/17720263281#step:13:93)18== Warning: invalid file descriptor 65524 in syscall close() ==9218== Warning: invalid file descriptor 65525 in syscall close() ==9218== Warning: invalid file descriptor 65526 in syscall close() ==9218== Warning: invalid file descriptor 65527 in syscall close() ==9218== Use --log-fd=<number> to select an alternative log fd. ==9218== Warning: invalid file descriptor 65528 in syscall close() ==9218== Warning: invalid file descriptor 65529 in syscall close() ==9219== Warning: invalid file descriptor 65524 in syscall close() ==9219== Warning: invalid file descriptor 65525 in syscall close() ==9219== Warning: invalid file descriptor 65526 in syscall close() ==9219== Warning: invalid file descriptor 65527 in syscall close() ==9219== Use --log-fd=<number> to select an alternative log fd. ==9219== Warning: invalid file descriptor 65528 in syscall close() ==9219== Warning: invalid file descriptor 65529 in syscall close() ... =========================== short test summary info ============================ SKIPPED [1] ../../tests/test_callbacks.py:213: Current PYBIND11_INTERNALS_VERSION too low SKIPPED [1] ../../tests/test_stl.py:147: no <experimental/optional> SKIPPED [1] ../../tests/test_stl.py:179: no <boost/optional> ================== 854 passed, 3 skipped in 470.23s (0:07:50) ================== ==8778== ==8778== HEAP SUMMARY: ==8778== in use at exit: 5,462,456 bytes in 33,183 blocks ==8778== total heap usage: 3,241,517 allocs, 3,208,334 frees, 322,998,060 bytes allocated ==8778== ==8778== 64 bytes in 1 blocks are indirectly lost in loss record 6,168 of 10,745 ==8778== at 0x483B7FB: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:307) ==8778== by 0x46FC97: _PyMem_RawMalloc (obmalloc.c:99) ==8778== by 0x471298: PyObject_Malloc (obmalloc.c:685) ==8778== by 0x54A083: _PyObject_GC_Alloc (gcmodule.c:2267) ==8778== by 0x54AE87: _PyObject_GC_Malloc (gcmodule.c:2294) ==8778== by 0x54AF42: _PyObject_GC_NewVar (gcmodule.c:2323) ==8778== by 0x47D87A: tuple_alloc (tupleobject.c:92) ==8778== by 0x47E5D6: PyTuple_New (tupleobject.c:110) ==8778== by 0x4E7B2F: _PyEval_EvalFrameDefault (ceval.c:2743) ==8778== by 0x4EE1A7: _PyEval_EvalFrame (pycore_ceval.h:40) ==8778== by 0x4EE1A7: _PyEval_EvalCode (ceval.c:4329) ==8778== by 0x4334B0: _PyFunction_Vectorcall (call.c:396) ==8778== by 0x4EB835: _PyObject_VectorcallTstate (abstract.h:118) ==8778== by 0x4EB835: PyObject_Vectorcall (abstract.h:127) ==8778== by 0x4EB835: call_function (ceval.c:5077) ==8778== by 0x4EB835: _PyEval_EvalFrameDefault (ceval.c:3506) ==8778== { <insert_a_suppression_name_here> Memcheck:Leak match-leak-kinds: indirect fun:malloc fun:_PyMem_RawMalloc fun:PyObject_Malloc fun:_PyObject_GC_Alloc fun:_PyObject_GC_Malloc fun:_PyObject_GC_NewVar fun:tuple_alloc fun:PyTuple_New fun:_PyEval_EvalFrameDefault fun:_PyEval_EvalFrame fun:_PyEval_EvalCode fun:_PyFunction_Vectorcall fun:_PyObject_VectorcallTstate fun:PyObject_Vectorcall fun:call_function fun:_PyEval_EvalFrameDefault } ==8778== LEAK SUMMARY: ==8778== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==8778== indirectly lost: 64 bytes in 1 blocks ==8778== possibly lost: 4,563,363 bytes in 27,266 blocks ==8778== still reachable: 745,477 bytes in 3,667 blocks ==8778== suppressed: 153,552 bytes in 2,249 blocks ==8778== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown. ==8778== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all ==8778== ==8778== For lists of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -s ==8778== ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 28 from 27)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
CI log files referenced under pybind/pybind11#4889
ad4875d
Comment out failing job, with link to pybind#4889
613e06c
Comment out failing job, with link to #4889 (#4890)
7969049
No branches or pull requests
Help is needed to diagnose and fix leak diagnostics that suddenly appeared due to unknown changes in the environment ("bit rot").
The log files are permanently archived here: https://github.com/rwgk/issues/tree/master/pybind11/issue_4889
Idea just in case nobody gets to this for a while: Simply try again, just in case the root cause is fixed upstream.
Problem:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: