-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixed crash when loading a PKCS#7 bundle with no certificates #9926
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think this fix is quite right. I believe this should actually raise an exception here, not return the empty list, because it's analogous to the block above, where you reject content types other than signed data.
Specifically, this is NULL if you've got a content-less ContentInfo:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2315#section-7
The spec says:
It honestly doesn't make any sense for the signed-data ContentInfos that you're parsing here. It's more for the data ContentInfo inside the signed-data ContentInfo. As the spec says later on here:
That is, an omitted one means "this is a signed data, but I am omitting the signature, certificates, etc., with the expectation that you have it out of band somewhere".
Setting aside whether there are any use cases for that, it certainly doesn't make sense in the context of your function. By returning the empty list, you are telling the caller "yup, this contained zero certificates!". But this actually may have contained a ton of certificates, you just didn't have them available. So this is actually a PKCS#7 blob that isn't of the type you expect.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I should add that, as far as compatibility goes, nothing can possibly be relying on you returning the empty list here because it used to crash. :-)