-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 320
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
release 0.15.4 #1871
Comments
I am in favour of a release. So far I have nothing that could constitute a release block or similar |
@trallard do you want me to do a release or an RC ? I'll do it tomorrow morning |
It's up to you @12rambau if you have some time. Just lmk what you prefer 😉 |
I'll do a RC-wait3days-release no worries |
Double check for quality-control
Prepare the codebase for a new version
Make the release
|
What would be nice for people who would like to help by testing, is a reminder of the command line to execute to install the release candidates. I'm not sure where this should appear: here, on the corresponding changelog pages, on the wiki, etc.? |
|
@drammock Thanks! But, if this command is written only here, there are chances that nobody will remind where to find it for the next RCs 😁 |
see #1891 on how to try alpha, beta, rc, nightly. |
See comments in #1871 (comment) --------- Co-authored-by: Daniel McCloy <dan@mccloy.info>
Oops my bad 😔 will make sure to remember |
@trallard now that @larsoner has tracked down the cause of SciPy's build errors (and it's not the theme's fault, see #1859 / scipy/scipy#20897), we have marked the theme as
parallel_write_safe=True
again. This is a big enough pain point (cf #1643 comments) that I think we should push out a release for it this week. OK with you? Anything that you or @gabalafou want to squeeze in before I cut an RC?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: